Fair Value & Investments
What to check in your filing: Disclose Level 3 valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs, and support equity-method vs. fair value elections.
19 staff comments from 16 companies. Outcomes: Agreed to revise: 13, Responded: 4, Awaiting / response not in dataset: 2
Kayne Anderson BDC, Inc. (KBDC) · 2026-07-13 · Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 · Comment 1 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: In the footnote to the schedule of investments that identifies Level 3 holdings, please disclose that the value was determined using significant unobservable inputs as required by Article 12-12, footnote 9 of Regulation S-X. letter →
Company response: The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that in the future it will revise the footnote to the Schedule of Investments in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and its next Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect that the value of Level 3 holdings was determined using significant unobservable inputs as required by Article 12-12, footnote 9 of Regulation S-X consistent with the following: Unless otherwise noted, security is a Level 3 holding. As of December 31, 2025, the aggregate value of Level 3 securities held by the Company was $2,151,743. The value of each investment was determined using unobservable inputs. See Note 5 – Fair Value. response letter →
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. (SMA) · 2026-04-14 · Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 Form 8-K filed February 25, 2026 · Comment 1 · Note 6. Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures, page F-31 Responded
Staff comment: Please tell us your consideration of providing financial statements pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X and summarized financial information pursuant to Rule 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X and ASC 323-10-50-3c for your equity method investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures and managed REITs. letter →
Company response: In our consideration of providing financial statements or summarized financial information for our equity method investments in our unconsolidated real estate ventures and Managed REITs, we evaluated and performed the requisite calculations pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X (“Rule 3-09”) and Rule 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X (“Rule 4-08(g)”). With respect to the Investment Test and Income Test required by Rule 3-09, we determined that none of our equity method investments were in excess of the 20% thresholds. Therefore, separate financial statements of the equity method investees were not required. Similarly, with respect to the Investment Test, Asset Test and Income Test, in accordance… response letter →
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) · 2026-03-27 · Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2025 Form 8-K furnished February 12, 2026 · Comment 2 · Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets, page 36 Responded
Staff comment: We note your disclosure on page 36 that the significant assumptions that are used to determine the estimated fair value of reporting units for impairment testing are forecasted revenue growth rates, operating income margins, market-participant discount rates and EBITDA multiples. You also disclose the actual assumptions used to estimate the fair values of the goodwill related to continuing operations tested quantitatively during the year ended December 27, 2025. Please explain to us, and revise your disclosure to clarify, the reporting units that were tested quantitatively versus qualitatively and explain why a quantitative analysis was performed. If any reporting units have a fair value… letter →
Company response: We acknowledge the Staff’s comment. Consistent with our policy, we elected to bypass the qualitative assessment and performed a quantitative goodwill impairment analysis for each of the reporting units as of December 27, 2025. ASC 350-20-35-3B provides the unconditional option to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative goodwill impairment test. We elected this approach for all reporting units due to the length of time that had elapsed since our previous quantitative assessment. response letter →
Waton Financial Ltd (WTF) · 2026-03-24 · Waton Financial Limited Form 20-F for Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2025 · Comment 2 · (n) Investment, cost, page F-11 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: We note that you assess impairment of your equity investment without a readily determinable fair value using an other-than-temporary model. We also note that ASU 2016-01 removed this model for these equity security investments to apply a one-step approach as explained further in paragraphs BC85 to BC89 of that ASU. As a result, please address the following: • Tell us whether your $618,630 impairment recorded in fiscal 2025 would have been larger or whether you would have recorded any impairment in fiscal 2024 if, instead of apply an other-than-temporary model, you employed a direct assessment of fair value to carrying value if indicators of impairment existed. If so, demonstrate to us… letter →
Company response: The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The Company’s equity investment, without a readily determinable fair value, is the less-than-1% ownership interest in New Markets (BVI) Limited (Microconnect), which is accounted for in accordance with ASC 321-10-35-2, 35-3, and 35-4, instead of the “other than temporary” method mentioned in Note 2(n) of the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended March 31, 2025 and 2024. Specifically, the Company performed a qualitative assessment for impairment indicators according to ASC 321-10-35-3 as of March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Company identified impairment indicators, including significant operating losses and… response letter →
VALVOLINE INC (VVV) · 2026-03-12 · . Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2025 Filed November 21, 2025 · Comment 2 · Page 2 Awaiting / response not in dataset
Staff comment: We understand from the disclosures on page 10 of your recent interim report that in conjunction with your acquisition of Breeze Autocare, you immediately sold 45 of the 207 stores acquired pursuant to a Federal Trade Commission Decision and Order. You state that the fair value was $90 million including an allocation of goodwill, although the sale generated a $57.9 million pre-tax loss, indicating sale proceeds of $32.1 million. Given the disparity between these amounts and considering the timeframe, tell us how you determined that the fair value was not the amount that you agreed to receive in exchange. Please also describe your approach in establishing reporting units and allocating the… letter →
Under Armour, Inc. (UA, UAA) · 2026-03-11 · Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2025 Filed May 22, 2025 · Comment 1 · Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets, page 54 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: We note your disclosure that in conducting an annual impairment test, you first review qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, and if factors indicate that is the case, or if you choose to bypass the qualitative assessment, you perform a quantitative impairment test. We further note that no goodwill impairments were recorded during Fiscal 2025, Fiscal 2024 or Fiscal 2023. Please revise your disclosures to ensure that you include an accounting policy addressing how you assess goodwill and intangible assets for impairment. Your disclosures should… letter →
Company response: 1. The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and undertakes to revise our future filings, beginning with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2026, to enhance and expand its accounting policy disclosures related to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment in Note 2 to its Consolidated Financial Statements and within the Critical Accounting Estimates discussion within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). For example, in any period that goodwill is impaired and considered a non-recurring fair value measurement, the Company will include the applicable ASC 820 disclosures, such as… response letter →
Atkore Inc. (ATKR) · 2026-03-10 · Form 10-K for the Year Ended September 30, 2025 Filed November 26, 2025 · Comment 2 · Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Goodwill Impairments, page 50 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: We note your disclosure that in fiscal 2025 you performed a quantitative impairment assessment for goodwill for your six reporting units. You recorded a goodwill impairment on the Mechanical reporting unit of $18.9 million as a result of this annual impairment test. You also indicated that the fair values of the Conduit & Fittings and EMEA reporting units exceed their respective carrying value, but changes in your valuation assumptions could have resulted in an impairment. However, you do not discuss the results of the remaining three reporting units. Please expand your critical accounting estimates disclosure to indicate whether the fair value substantially exceeds book value for all… letter →
Company response: Refer to Item 303(b)(3) of Regulation S-K and Section V of SEC Release No. 33-8350 for guidance. Company Response: In future filings, we will expand our critical accounting estimates disclosure to address all reporting units. We have included an example, italicized below, of what we would expect to disclose in a future filing assuming the facts and circumstances at September 30, 2025 and starting at the paragraph on page 51 beginning with "In fiscal 2025, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment on the Mechanical reporting unit of $18.9 million. . ." In fiscal 2025, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment on the Mechanical reporting unit of $18.9 million as a result of its annual… response letter →
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) · 2026-03-05 · Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2025 Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2025 · Comment 1 · Results of Operations, page 28 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: We have read your response to comment one. Please further revise your future filings as applicable to highlight that the change in fair value of contingent consideration of $15.0 million recognized during the three months ended August 31, 2025, resulted in net income for the period then ended, when we note you historically report a net loss. letter →
Company response: to comment one. Please further revise your future filings as applicable to highlight that the change in fair value of contingent consideration of $15.0 million recognized during the three months ended August 31, 2025, resulted in net income for the period then ended, when we note you historically report a net loss. We appreciate the Staff’s comment and respectfully submit that we will revise our future filings pursuant to your comment above. response letter →
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) · 2026-02-24 · Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2025 Filed December 1, 2025 · Comment 1 · Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets, page 27 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: We note the disclosure in your financial statement footnotes that you performed a quantitative impairment analysis related to certain reporting units and a qualitative impairment analysis related to other reporting units and concluded no goodwill was impaired. Given the significance of your goodwill balance, please revise your Critical Accounting Estimates in future filings to clarify whether any of your reporting units are at risk of failing the goodwill impairment test. A reporting unit is at risk of failing the impairment test if it has a fair value that is not substantially in excess of carrying value. If no reporting units are at risk based on your most recent impairment test, please… letter →
Company response: Refer to Item 303(b)(3) of Regulation S-K and Section V of SEC Release No. 33-8350 for guidance . Company Response In future filings, to the extent applicable, we will include as part of our critical accounting estimate disclosures the fact that no reporting units are at risk of failing the impairment test as they have a fair value that is substantially in excess of carrying value. Our proposed revised wording for this critical accounting estimate is below (changes underlined for emphasis). Proposed wording in future Form 10-K filings: Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets Our Management annually reviews goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment or whenever events or changes in… response letter →
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) · 2026-02-18 · Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2025 Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2025 · Comment 1 · Results of Operations, page 28 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: You state on page 39 that "During the three months ended August 31, 2025, the Company recognized $15.0 million of change in the fair value of contingent consideration as the likelihood of achievement decreased to 0% of such contingent consideration related to the Montauk Brewing acquisition." However, we note from page 110 of your May 31, 2025 Form 10-K that the probability of achieving such contingent consideration was "100%" as of that date. Please explain to us in detail and revise your future filings as necessary to describe the events that transpired during the three months ended August 31, 2025 that resulted in your determination that the $15.0 million payout was no longer likely to… letter →
Company response: to the Staff’s comment, the Company respectfully submits that we will revise our future filings, as necessary, to describe the events that transpired during the three months ended August 31, 2025 that resulted in our determination that the $15.0 million payout was no longer likely to occur at all. response letter →
Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN) · 2026-01-27 · Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2025 · Comment 1 · Goodwill, page 39 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: Please provide information for investors to assess the probability of future goodwill impairment charges. For example, please disclose whether your reporting units are at risk of failing the quantitative impairment test or that the fair value is substantially in excess of carrying value and is not at risk of failing. If a reporting unit is at risk of failing, you should disclose: • the percentage by which fair value exceeded carrying value at the date of the most recent test; • a more detailed description of the methods and key assumptions used and how the key assumptions were determined; • a discussion of the degree of uncertainty associated with the assumptions; and • a description of… letter →
Company response: We acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In response thereto, we advise the Staff that in our presentation in future filings, commencing with the next 10-K filing, we will disclose if the fair value of a reporting unit substantially exceeds carrying value and is not at risk of failing, or if the fair value of a reporting unit does not substantially exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit, we will include the following disclosures: • the percentage by which fair value exceeded carrying value at the date of the most recent test; • a more detailed description of the methods and key assumptions used and how the key assumptions were determined; • a discussion of the degree of uncertainty… response letter →
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp (OCSL) · 2026-01-27 · · Comment 1 · comment followed by the Fund’s response. Agreed to revise
Staff comment: Please describe the active markets referenced as a basis for determining a Level 1 fair value letter →
Company response: , please confirm if cross-trades were executed in any of these securities during the relevant period pursuant to Rule 17a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Response: The Fund’s cash equivalents as of September 30, 2025 consisted of an investment in a single money market fund. In future filings, the Fund will identify the active markets used as a basis for determining that its cash equivalents are categorized as Level 1. The Fund, as well as other funds that are managed by an affiliate of the Fund’s investment adviser, actively transact in these money market funds on a daily basis. The Fund does not engage in cross-trades pursuant to Rule 17a-7 of the Investment Company… response letter →
Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC · 2026-01-27 · Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025 · Comment 1 · Fund’s response. Agreed to revise
Staff comment: Please review and confirm the accuracy of footnote (c) to the significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 investments table on page 98 of the filing. letter →
Company response: The Fund respectfully submits that it will confirm the usage of all footnotes in the Level 3 investments table in its future filings. response letter →
Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC · 2026-01-27 · Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025 · Comment 2 · the usage of all footnotes in the Level 3 investments table in its future filings. Agreed to revise
Staff comment: Please describe the active markets referenced as a basis for determining a Level 1 fair value letter →
Company response: , please confirm if cross-trades were executed in any of these securities during the relevant period pursuant to Rule 17a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Austin Bay Area Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Frankfurt Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Miami Munich New York Paris Philadelphia Riyadh Salt Lake City Shanghai United States Securities and Exchange Commission Response: The Fund’s cash equivalents as of September 30, 2025 consisted of investments in two money market funds. In future filings, the Fund will identify the active markets used as a basis for determining that its cash equivalents are categorized as Level 1. The Fund, as well as other funds that… response letter →
AZZ INC (AZZ) · 2026-01-16 · Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2025 Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter Ended November 30, 2025 · Comment 1 · Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 6 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: We note the $273.2 million distribution on investment in AVAIL joint venture classified within operating activities. We further note from your disclosures in Note 8 that at the time of this distribution, the amount of the distribution exceeded your investment in the AVAIL JV of $107.4 million, resulting in the reduction of your investment in the AVAIL JV to zero and recognition of the excess amount of distribution as a gain. With a view to clarifying how you determined that none of this distribution amount was a return of your investment in the AVAIL JV that would be classified as an investing activity as contemplated by ASC 230-10-45-12(b), please revise your upcoming February 28, 2026… letter →
Company response: Refer to ASC 230-10-45-21D. Response: The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The Company has elected and will disclose in its upcoming Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2026 and future filings, to follow the cumulative earnings approach when determining the classification of distributions received from equity method investees, in accordance with ASC 230-10-45-21D. In future filings, beginning with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2026, we will update our accounting policy to include information substantially similar to the following: Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture We account for the investment in our joint venture under the… response letter →
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC (MHK) · 2025-12-19 · Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 Filed February 20, 2025 · Comment 1 · Critical Accounting Policies, page 33 Responded
Staff comment: We note that you recorded material goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges in prior periods. We also note that the assessment of goodwill for impairment is identified by your auditor as a critical audit matter in their audit report. Based on the continued materiality of goodwill and intangible assets to your financial statements, underlying negative operating trends, and the fact that your net book value exceeds your market capitalization, please more fully explain to us how you determined the estimated fair values of your reporting units exceed their carrying values. In addition, to the extent you conclude an impairment charge that could materially impact your financial statements… letter →
Company response: As described in Critical Accounting Policies in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Company has identified Global Ceramic, Flooring North America (“Flooring NA”) and Flooring Rest of the World (“Flooring ROW”) as its reporting units for the purposes of allocating goodwill as well as assessing impairments. As of the Company’s 2024 annual goodwill impairment testing date, which was the first day of the fourth quarter of 2024 (the “2024 Annual Impairment Test Date”), the Company completed quantitative goodwill impairment tests (the “Annual Impairment Tests”) and determined that the estimated fair values of its reporting units with goodwill exceeded their… response letter →
PGIM Private Real Estate Fund, Inc. · 2025-12-16 · · Comment 6 · equity. Responded
Staff comment: The Staff notes that the first footnote to the Level 3 Investments table on page 13 of the Annual Report states that “[t]he table does not include Level 3 holdings that are valued at the original par value.” Please confirm that the par value approximates the fair value. letter →
Company response: The Fund hereby confirms that the par value approximates the fair value of the holdings. response letter →
PGIM Private Real Estate Fund, Inc. · 2025-12-16 · · Comment 7 · 2 Agreed to revise
Staff comment: Please also explain why these Level 3 Investments are “not subject to fair value adjustment as of December 31, 2024.” letter →
Company response: The Fund respectfully confirms that a full assessment under ASC 820 was applied to its Level 3 Investments. The Fund clarifies that its Level 3 investments—the Capodagli NJ TOD portfolio mezzanine loan acquired in July 2024 and the Pearland preferred equity acquired in October 2023—are fair valued at the original par value. These prices represent the highest weighting and the most recent observable market transactions, with no material changes in operations, revenue, or capital markets, and no other relevant factors warranting adjustment as of December 31, 2024. Additionally, based on our standard quarterly analysis, we concluded that these investments do not require adjustment to fair… response letter →
NEIGHBORHOOD INTELLIGENCE, INC. (NXH, BBBY, BBBYW) · 2025-11-18 · Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024 Item 2.02 Form 8-K Dated October 27, 2025 Resp · Comment 4 · Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations, page 7 Awaiting / response not in dataset
Staff comment: Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share in prior comment 4: • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and • Confirm that you will present the income tax effect separately from other non- GAAP adjustments as it does not appear that you have done so in… letter →
Free weekly digest
New SEC comment letters by topic, notable staff comments, fresh disclosure examples and effective-date reminders. One email a week.
Subscribe free →Opens our beehiiv signup page. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
Templates & resources
- AICPA & CIMA – SEC reporting resources (AICPA & CIMA · Professional body · Free / member)
- BDO Accounting, Reporting & Compliance Hub (ARCH) (BDO · Firm guide · Free)
- Deloitte DART – Roadmap Series (Deloitte · Firm guide · Free)
- Deloitte Roadmap: SEC Comment Letter Considerations (Deloitte · Firm guide · Free)
- KPMG Financial Reporting View (KPMG · Firm guide · Free)
- PwC Viewpoint (PwC · Firm guide · Free / paid)
- RSM Financial Reporting Resource Center (RSM · Firm guide · Free)
- SEC – EDGAR Full Text Search (SEC · Regulator · Free)