SRSEC Reporting Desk

Retail & Restaurants › Disclosure examples

Retail & Restaurants: Pay versus performance

Note: Item 402(v) pay-versus-performance disclosure (typically in the proxy statement).
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW (COST) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2025-08-31 · filed 2025-12-04 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, this section describes the relationship between compensation actually paid and certain financial performance measures of the Company. For information about the philosophy, objectives and criteria of executive pay as they pertain to the Company's performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO($) 1Summary Compensation Table Total for Former PEO($) 1Compensation Actually Paid to PEO($) 1,2Compensation Actually Paid to Former PEO($) 1,2Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs($) 1Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs($) 1,2Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income($) 5 (in millions)Net Sales Adjusted for Changes in Foreign Currencies ($) 6 (in millions)
TSR($) 3Peer Group TSR($) 4
202513,932,597—15,633,675—6,250,4316,854,360293.59173.488,099271,855
202412,229,74116,049,87018,702,31929,445,3708,381,97811,133,897276.32154.787,367250,099
2023—16,870,623—18,733,7736,304,7156,926,922163.78129.006,292241,194
2022—9,905,070—11,868,8755,806,0236,353,825158.84128.265,844224,492
2021—8,804,752—10,342,1084,724,7765,794,960133.65184.845,007189,293
Verbatim excerpt (183 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
CARVANA CO. (CVNA) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2025-12-31 · filed 2026-03-25 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. We use grants of time-based RSUs, and have previously used stock

options to incentivize our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. We have further previously used PSUs to tie executive incentives to key metrics in the Company's operating plan and future success. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company’s philosophy aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for CEO (1)Compensation Actually Paid to CEO (2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs (3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs (4)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income (in millions) (7)Adjusted EBITDA (8)
Company Total Shareholder Return (5)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)
20258,382,555110,136,0057,372,98794,899,087176.18150.081,8952,237
202410,595,400118,068,0799,291,363103,567,57584.90148.714041,378
20236,454,66138,123,0225,694,36032,914,70222.10109.75150339
20225,594,436( 10,103,013 )5,017,181( 8,193,813 )1.9877.70( 2,894 )( 1,041 )
20215,050,3455,302,9814,426,6545,423,45896.76118.97( 287 )64

(1) Mr. Garcia was our Chief Executive Officer in all years presented. The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Garcia for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (the “SCT”). Refer to “Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Summary Compensation Table.”

Verbatim excerpt (320 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
YUM BRANDS INC (YUM) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-05-14 · filed 2026-04-03 · Section: PA Y Ver sus Performance Disclosure

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) and certain financial performance of the Company. The Management Planning and Development Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure when making its incentive compensation decisions. For further information about how we align executive compensation with the company’s performance, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 36 above. The amounts in the table below are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not represent amounts actually earned or realized by NEOs, including with respect to SARs, RSUs and PSUs. See the “2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table on page 64 for more information.

The following table sets forth additional compensation information of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our non-CEO NEOs along with total shareholder return, net income, and Core Operating Profit Growth performance results for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.

Verbatim excerpt (175 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →

See all Pay versus performance examples →

Templates & resources

Listed alphabetically by provider. Listings are not endorsements; no provider pays for placement. All templates & resources